After
reading these two articles I can see how they relate and I can also see how
contemporary art students can relate to them.
I definitely see a push for beauty and function in pieces and there is a
point in the making process where the maker decides whether they are going the
function or nonfunctional route. The
ending paragraph o f Art Vs. Craft says,
“the craftsman’s options become more varied and complex, so does the maker’s
perspective”; I interpreted this as there are certain thinking processes when
making functional pieces but it requires a different thinking process when
making abstract. I think the loathing
directed toward “craft” is almost hysterical when Cezanne even referred to
craftsman as imbeciles, as though quality doesn’t stand for anything, whereas
Gropius in the 20th century showed a shift in the attitude towards
craft. I really enjoyed Towards a Standard of Beauty and the
way the argument for both handmade and machine made built up. I feel there is a need for beauty in everyday
items, there’s something about living with beautiful items that makes the
quality of everyday better. There is a
place for machine made objects, but there is something about an item that is
handmade. As in giving a gift there’s
something more unique in giving something handmade mug than in a cup that
anyone can buy at Target. But at looking
at where art is going there is a convergence of utilizing machines while maintaining
that individual quality that handmade piece have.
No comments:
Post a Comment